RaleyVille Time:
SACRAMENTO "RALEY" BEE 
The Sacramento Bee Since 1857

Some images on this page may be offensive.  Viewer discretion is advised. 

Yeah, the Sacramento Bee newspaper sure is corrupt.

 Below represents probably one of the most dishonest newspapers in America spitting out nonsense to the public.  This newspaper is called the Sacramento Bee.  It's no wonder that so many people in America have decided that subscribing to newspapers isn't worth their time or money.  Newspapers are owned and operated by their advertisers.  And it wouldn't be surprising to find out that an easy way for somebody wealthy to get a reporter to report something posititive about them is to buy that reporter off.  

Who's got caught in the Raley Web? And, look who is doing the 'Dance' together.

 

 

            

 

<a href="http://i.b5z.net/i/u/1350838/f/Beethoven___Flight_Of_The_Bumble_Bee_1_.mp3">Play the media using the stand alone Player</a>
The Bee is caught again...

The Public Editor: The Bee deserves answers to ensure its credibility

By Armando Acuņa -- The Public Editor
Published 2:15 am PDT Sunday, May 15, 2005

Here we go again. Another veteran journalist who should know better stands accused of reader fraud, deceit and fabrication.

Again, the wounds are self-inflicted. Again, the credibility of the industry is called into question. Again, critics of the newspaper are given new ammunition to fire away. Again, readers are asked for forgiveness.

The difference this time around is that the journalistic malfeasance occurred right here at The Bee. Or did it? To read Diana Griego Erwin's statement printed in Thursday's paper, she did nothing wrong, the sources in her columns that the editors can't find do in fact exist and that they will show up eventually. Yet she resigned, the trust destroyed between her and the paper.

My response to her: Show us the goods.

Think about the newspaper and your colleagues. Why have their hard-earned credibility besmirched - directly or indirectly - if you have the power to stop it, if you have the answers to the questions?

I spoke to Griego Erwin by phone briefly Thursday morning, the same day the paper published executive editor Rick Rodriguez's column announcing her resignation while in the midst of an internal inquiry into her columns. She said she had company at her home and promised to talk later at an appointed time. Minutes before we were to talk, she sent an e-mail, declining to speak after all. Instead she sent a statement, which read:

"I loved writing a column for the people of Sacramento and I stand completely by my stories. The thousands of people I interviewed over the years know I do my job. This investigation came during a string of personal crises in my life when I wasn't at my best to deal with it and, frankly, I didn't have the emotional reserve to answer The Bee's questions quickly enough. I haven't set a timeline to answer the unanswered questions because I desperately need some time off to deal with private, personal matters."

What can't be left dangling, however, is the paper's credibility. No one is above that.

"This is a critical time for credibility in our industry," Rodriguez told the dozens of reporters and editors who gathered at 6 p.m. Wednesday in The Bee's newsroom to hear the announcement of Griego Erwin's resignation and some details of the internal inquiry.

And he is right.

The litany of journalistic misdeeds in the last several weeks alone is enough to make you wonder whether we are in the midst of some dastardly epidemic that is destroying healthy journalistic brain cells or whether, like a bad remake of the horror movie "Invasion of the Body Snatchers," aliens have rewired journalists' circuitry nationwide. Preposterous, of course, but at least there would be something that poses as an explanation.

From the suspension of columnist Mitch Albom at the Detroit Free Press for writing a column about events that never happened to the firing of Los Angeles Times reporter Eric Slater for a story about Chico State that contained sources that may not exist to the resignation last week of USA Today reporter Tom Squitieri after his editors said he lifted quotations from other newspapers without attribution, the list of infamy grows longer.

What's perhaps most troubling is that because of the Internet and popular media Web sites such as the one run by Jim Romenesko, at Poynter.org, the glare of scrutiny has never been so bright.

You can't fake it or confine it to your town anymore. A breach of ethics in Sacramento is now immediately known in Miami, or Philadelphia, or New York, or Fort Huachucha, Ariz.

It's the new media landscape. Journalists who don't understand that or think they aren't being watched or held to higher public standards are naive and risking their credibility and integrity as well as that of their newspapers.

The smart journalist is more vigilant about his sources, more careful with his facts, more attuned to ethical circumstances, even when, as is the case here, the first warning came not from the Internet but from an assistant city editor editing Griego Erwin's column on April 23.

"I think we have to have a higher standard," Rodriguez said in an interview. "This is one thing the (newspaper) industry has to stand up for ... (the thing) that will set us apart is enforcing standards and having people trust us."

"This is gut-wrenching to air our dirty laundry, absolutely, but we're trying to be as straight as we can."

As was described to the staff Wednesday, the editors said that after questions arose about the April 23 column, they asked Griego Erwin to verify the accuracy of other columns and the existence of sources she had cited. They picked sources in Griego Erwin's columns that were considered the easiest for her to verify, that were in the paper most recently and that had names, ages and neighborhoods of residence clearly described.

When she failed to provide the information that the editors had requested, the paper's inquiry went up another notch, and more sources and columns were questioned, eventually leading to Wednesday's resignation.

What makes the pain worse is that The Bee had been on a roll.

So far this year, it had won several of American journalism's highest awards, including a Pulitzer Prize for editorial writing, a Polk award for stories about the hierarchy of the California Highway Patrol abusing the state's disability retirement system and a Robert F. Kennedy prize for international photography for pictures of Hmong refugees. That's a very good year, especially for a regional paper like The Bee.

Columnists at this paper lead a hectic and, for some, a grueling professional life. Griego Erwin was among the top-rated columnists in the paper's readership surveys.

The pace is demanding, perhaps too demanding.

Griego Erwin wrote three columns a week, a schedule that tends to keep writers on a fast-moving treadmill, quickly moving from column to column, a stress compounded when much reporting is involved. That invites the temptation to cut corners, to take short cuts.

Perhaps the paper should throttle back its demands to two columns a week for those columnists who write three or more columns a week, minimizing the temptations to cheat and potentially leading to better reported and better written columns. It is at least worth a temporary trial.

Meanwhile, we go back to where we started: Show us the goods.

About the writer:

Click on this article and read the email sent to truth seeker Denny Walsh.
Click on the Bee's Obudsman picture to open a PDF file.  Below is the Bee's website featuring the Ombudman's section.  Contact Tony and ask him about the true story about Raley's and why the Bee doesn't want their readers to know the truth about Raley's.

This newspaper should be renamed -THE SACRAMENTO RALEY BEE

Tony Marcano, the Bee's Ombudsman worked back in New York too.  In fact, Tony worked with the New York Times.  Where Jason Blair used to write his truthful stories.

To the right is a photograph of the Sacramento Bee main office located in downtown Sacramento.  Fliers about Charles Nordby and Raley's were distributed out in  front of their office building.  While the Bee has arrogantly stated by their silence that they are the supreme power and decision maker of what news it brings forth in their newspaper, the Bee fails to realize that they have no control of what news is presented publicly-even if it is right out in front of their own office building. Also, the Bee fails to realize that because they don't have any good ethics, they are unable to publish this story.  Overall, this may be the most embarrassing public newspaper in America today.  Bought by their advertisers!   Click on the photo and you will be able to open up a pdf file and hear the Sacramento Bee's refusal to run an advertisement about this web site..
pdf file-click on photo to hear the Bee

Over to the left is a letter that the Sacramento Bee published about Wal-Mart.  The Bee didn't need any approval from this company regarding using their name in this letter about them... 

This letter represents just one of many the "Bee" has published from this same gentleman over the years.  Not only will this man not support Wal-Mart, but he also won't support the biggest thieves in America!!! 

The Bee doesn't put that many articles about Joyce Raley Teel and Jim Teel in their newspaper anymore.  It would be appropriate for the Sacramento Bee to give their readers the truth about Raley's and their friends at Raley's, and how Raley's actually became successful.  Back in 1991, the Bee published an article about Raley's and Charles Collings that is totally inaccurate and misleading.  It featured Charles Collings as some kind of man with integrity, honesty, and a super authentic Christian.  The Bee article also claimed that Mr. Collings was the most influencial man to Raley's success after Tom Raley made him President in 1969.  However, the Bee doesn't seem to have any newpaper articles in their archives to show Tom Raley publicly making Charles Collings President.  I wonder why?  Below, you will see other articles found in the Bee's archives concerning Tom Raley and Jim Teel.  And by all accounts, Tom Raley should have promoted his son in law Jim to be President in 1969.  Also, there didn't seem to be any Bee article proclaiming Tom Raley's marriage to Joan in 1973.  Raley's had a lot of important things that happened to them in 1973 that they didn't want the public to know about in their history book.  It was obvious why they didn't want to mention Charles Nordby in their history book.  However, Joan was Mr. Raley's second wife, and there was absolutely nothing mentioned about his marriage to Joan in Raley's history book.  In fact, after Tom Raley passed away at the end of 1991, the Bee newspaper didn't even mention Tom Raley having a second wife named Joan.  And this is the newspaper in Sacramento that likes to promote the phrase "the public has the right to know the truth." 
 
DEDICATION | WHO IS CHARLES NORDBY? | RALEY'S | NEWS MEDIA | THE CHURCH | ALBERTSONS | CONTACT |
Site Mailing List  Sign Guest Book  View Guest Book 
HE MADE RALEY'S SUCCESSFUL AND RALEY'S DEFRAUDED HIM!

RALEY'S EXPOSED

SACRAMENTO, CA 95827

Email: truth@raleysexposed.com

Powered by NetIDNow
WebStudio Website Builder